曼昆《经济学原理》第五版微观经济学习题答案(英文)..doc

曼昆《经济学原理》第五版微观经济学习题答案(英文)..doc

  1. 1、本文档被系统程序自动判定探测到侵权嫌疑,本站暂时做下架处理。
  2. 2、如果您确认为侵权,可联系本站左侧在线QQ客服请求删除。我们会保证在24小时内做出处理,应急电话:400-050-0827。
  3. 3、此文档由网友上传,因疑似侵权的原因,本站不提供该文档下载,只提供部分内容试读。如果您是出版社/作者,看到后可认领文档,您也可以联系本站进行批量认领。
查看更多
曼昆《经济学原理》第五版微观经济学习题答案(英文).

WHAT’S NEW IN THE FIFTH EDITION: There is a new In the News feature on “This Is Your Brain on Economics.” LEARNING OBJECTIVES: By the end of this chapter, students should understand: ? how to examine problems caused by asymmetric information. ? the market solutions to asymmetric information. ? why democratic voting systems may not represent the preferences of society. ? why people may not always behave as rational maximizers. CONTEXT AND PURPOSE: Chapter 22 is the last chapter in the microeconomics portion of the text. It is the second of two unrelated chapters that introduce students to advanced topics in microeconomics. These two chapters are intended to whet their appetites for further study in economics. The purpose of Chapter 22 is to give students a taste of three topics on the frontier of microeconomic research. The first topic addressed is asymmetric information, a situation when one person in an economic relationship has more relevant knowledge than the other person does. The second topic is political economy, the application of economic tools to the understanding of the functioning of government. The third topic addressed is behavioral economics, the introduction of psychology into the study of economic issues. KEY POINTS: ? In many economic transactions, information is asymmetric. When there are hidden actions, principals may be concerned that agents suffer from the problem of moral hazard. When there are hidden characteristics, buyers may be concerned about the problem of adverse selection among the sellers. Private markets sometimes deal with asymmetric information with signaling and screening. ? Although government policy can sometimes improve market outcomes, governments are themselves imperfect institutions. The Condorcet paradox shows that the majority rule fails to produce transitive preferences for society, and the Arrow impossibility theorem shows that no voting scheme will be perfect. In many situations,

文档评论(0)

fglgf11gf21gI + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档