AbortionintheUnitedStates-GuttmacherInstitute.pptVIP

* Note: In 1989, the survey wording changed, and the nonwhite category was further refined into” black” and “other.” Sources: 1973–1988: Henshaw SK and Van Vort J, eds., Abortion Factbook, 1992 Edition: Readings, Trends and State and Local Data to 1988, New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1992, Table 3. 1989, 1993–1994: Special tabulations of distributions published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, adjusted for year-to-year changes in the reporting states. 1990, 1995: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2001, 121st ed., Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2001. 1991: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1996, 116th ed., Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1996. 1992: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1998, 118th ed., Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1998. 1996: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2000, 120th ed., Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2000. 1997–2009: Special distributions published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, adjusted by the Guttmacher Institute for year-to-year changes in the reporting states. Source Presentation: Trends in Abortion in the United States, 1973–2008 * Note: In 1991, women were asked to identify themselves as white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, or Native American. Sources: 1973–1988: Henshaw SK and Van Vort J, eds., Abortion Factbook, 1992 Edition: Readings, Trends and State and Local Data to 1988, New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1992, Table 3. 1989, 1993–1994: Special tabulations of distributions published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, adjusted for year-to-year changes in the reporting states. 1990, 1995: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2001, 121st ed., Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2001. 1991: U.S. Bureau