Evaluation of the University Managed Learning Environment (MLE).ppt

下载文档 降价啦

10
0
约 10页
2015-09-24 发布于重庆
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

Evaluation of the University Managed Learning Environment (MLE).ppt

1、本文档共10页，可阅读全部内容。
2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

Evaluation of the University Managed Learning Environment (MLE)

* Evaluation of the University Managed Learning Environment (MLE) Stephen BruceAcademic Development Evaluation of the University MLE Staff students were asked to describe their experience of WebCT using up to three keywords: Which is the staff word cloud ? Evaluation of the University MLE Feedback organised into Educational Review and Systems Review documents. Main themes outlined in an Executive Summary. Evaluation of the University MLE Strongly Agree / Agree Evaluation of the University MLE Evaluation of the University MLE Evaluation of the University MLE Evaluation of the University MLE Evaluation of the University MLE Executive Summary The overall student learning experience has been enhanced Students now expect WebCT as a normal part of module support Staff are more confident and are interested in using interactive features Range of issues Consistency of experience Resource implications Locally available support Technical and administrative issues Evaluation of the University MLE Next steps Replacing WebCT Blackboard support for WebCT drops in January 2013 The university?requires a new system by session 2012-13 Pilot a new system in session 2011-12 ? Staff consultation This evaluation focusses mainly on WebCT but also includes and other technologies and university services used in the support of learning. There have been previous evaluations in 2004, and on smaller scale in 2006 so we were looking to get as full a picture as possible of where we are at as an institution, and reassessing our requirements from both an educational and technical perspective. So I’m going to provide an overview of the evaluation reports, the main themes emerging, and the next steps. The data was gathered between April and June last year. Issued two online surveys and received responses from over 1200 students 125 staff Myself and colleagues in Academic Development interviewed 20 campus-based and distance learning students We were assisted in the overall evaluation by F